// MidPledge
The Trust Layer for
AI Delegated Authority
Platforms govern agents. MidPledge assures their authority to the outside world.
When an AI agent acts across an organizational boundary, the other side needs to know what it is authorized to do. MidPledge makes that authority current, transaction-bound and independently verifiable.
// The trust gap
Internal governance isn't external assurance.
Internal platforms govern their own agents — policies, permissions, approvals. An external relying party can't see any of that. For a specific action, it needs evidence of what the agent is authorized to do that it can check for itself.
Verify authority at the source — not from the agent's claim.
The relying party's question
“Is this agent genuinely authorized by the organization it represents to perform this specific action, under these limits, right now?”
- Inside: policies · permissions · approvals
- Across: source-resolved, current, transaction-bound evidence
// Authority in action
One transaction, across the boundary
Principal → agent and authority source → transaction binding → MidPledge verification → relying-party decision → Authority Receipt. Step through it, then change the transaction yourself.
Authority Receipt
MP-TX-DEMO-7C21
- Principal
- Company A
- Agent
- Agent-27
- Counterparty
- Organization B
- Scope
- DATA_RELEASE · dataset Q3 · purpose: audit · ≤ 30 days
- Source
- Principal-authorized policy source · v12
- Verified at
- 2026-01-15T10:42:07Z
- Decision
- Organization B · ACCEPTED under its own policy
- Evidence digest
- sha256:demo…9e41
Illustrative Authority Receipt. Not a legal agreement.
Interactive example · Sample data · a presentation sequence, not a protocol specification.
// Verify Explorer
Change the transaction. Watch the decision.
One worked example — an agent places an order with an external supplier. Move the limit, swap the counterparty, revoke authority or take the source offline.
“authorized up to USD 100,000”
Authority below comes from Company A's authorized source: limit 10,000 · approval above 7,500 · approved suppliers only.
Supplier
Authority state
Human approval
Authority source
// Applications
Different actions. One authority problem.
The same reusable check applies wherever an agent's action has consequences for someone outside its own platform.
B1 · Enterprise System & API
Production API Action
Agent invokes a consequential external or internal API under action/resource limits.
C2 · Data
External Data Sharing
Agent releases data to another organization under purpose/recipient constraints.
F3 · Delegation & Multi-Agent
Cross-Company Agent Delegation
One organization authorizes another party's agent for a bounded task.
A map of where the model applies — not a list of currently available products.
Explore all 41 use cases// Who MidPledge serves
Two sides of one trust boundary
The organization that delegates authority and the organization that relies on it need different things. The trust checkpoint connects them.
“Our agents act for us. Others need to trust that.”
- Keep governance in the sources you authorize
- Set scope, limits and approvals once
- Revocation takes effect at the next verification
MidPledge
trust checkpoint
resolve · bind · verify
“An agent wants us to act. Is it authorized?”
- Verify this exact action yourself, before accepting
- See current state — active, revoked or unverifiable
- Decide under your own policy; keep the evidence
Platforms, networks, trust providers and developers participate on either side. Roles and categories — not customers or partners. For enterprises →
Start a conversation
Whether you delegate authority to agents, receive their actions, build them or want to explore a partnership.
Register Interest